Wednesday, March 26, 2008

So here’s a commercial that’s been irking me. It’s on all the time, it’s for State Farm insurance, and there are several things problematic about it.

First, let’s try to understand what State Farm’s trying to tell us. Somehow, when you need to choose between two similar things, one a solid committed brand name, and one a similarly-named knock off, that is cheaper, but lower in quality, you should clearly take the slightly-more-expensive-but-far-more-valuable choice. In other words, you might say State Farm is the “Coach K” of insurance companies, while perhaps Geico is the “Coach J.”

Now the Coach K part makes sense, in that, we all know and recognize him as a top the coaching profession. So the commercials sets you up to think it’s going to show a cheaper coach, which for some reason, we would both recognize as inferior, and would have some kind of name related to Coach K. But who is this Coach J? First, of all, why is he named Coach J? We recognize he’s supposed to be a generic ridiculous coach, but why J? Merely because it rhymes with K, I suppose, but there’s nothing about him that suggests a J surname. And why does Coach J look eerily like Dwight Shrute? Also, does one even want to think about they had to pay Coach K for three seconds when he has absolutely no essential place in this commercial? Why are middle-aged adults even paying to be taught by Coach J?

There are just too many questions about this commercial for me to even digest…

There’s no worse commercial than one that makes you feel like you’re missing something, even though you’re not. It’s like a Dr. Seuss style approach to wordplay – if you don’t have a word to rhyme, make up one; if you don’t have a aptly named bad coach to make your wordplay work, make up one.

So after waking up early yesterday to see the first MLB game of the season, I didn't feel like waking up for today's, and thanks to the combonation of a reshowing on ESPN2 at 2, and the good fortune to have no class on Wednesday, I've decided to watch it on tape-delay, which brings up the oft controversial subject amongst sports fans of tape delay, or watching a recorded sporting event later.

Most have tried to do it at one point or another, sometimes there are commitments one can't get out of simply because of the excuse that important sports are on. Some people I know claim that there is no value in watching a sporting event later, even if you know nothing about it; just the fact that it's over is too much. I am not of that school; I've tried it, and done it occasionally successfully - the toughest part is, first, having to decide, wherever you are at, whether you should try to get updates during the game, or have the commitment and foresight to hold it all off until you can watch it, and second, of course, to block out/not hear scores and updates once you make your decision.

I do this most commonly with football (soccer) matches that I DV-R off Fox Soccer Channel - this is relatively easy as I can pretty much bank on never ever finding out what happened unless I specifically look up the scores - one of the few benefits of the lack of popularity of football in America.

In March 2003, for the NCAA tournament's first weekend, in one of the nicest things my parents ever did for me, when I was in Spain, they taped all the first and second round games. Now, in this case though I decided I'd just pick and watch the exciting parts later; there was no way, first, I was going to wait the whole weekend to find out how my bracket was doing, and second, was going to find the time for 25 hours of programming or so during the week.

Of the two most successful times for me of recording and watching events later, one was not even a sporting event.

First, the sporting event: Again in 2003, in Syracuse's run to the title, they played Oklahoma in the elite 8 on the second sunday (march 30) of the tournament. I had a prior commitment to go see some play with my family, so I taped the game. After the play, my parents drove me to my dorm, and I of course insisted they turn off the radio - Elite 8 results are pretty big, big enough to get announced even during the minute sports segments of news stations. Eventually I got back, and immediately watched the game, maybe about two or three hours behind the actual game time, and was treated to a thrashing of Oklahoma, where Carmelo Anthony scored 20 points and had 10 rebounds, to send the 'Cuse to their first Final Four since 1996. All in all, well worth recording.

The second, and perhaps even harder taping, was The Sopranos finale. I was in Israel when the finale aired, and honestly, the only way I was able to avoid having it spoiled for me, was having the good fortune not just to miss the finale, but at least to also be on a plane for most of the next day after the finale, where if I was in New York, I couldn't have turned on a TV, radio or been on the internet without reading anything. However, after the first day reports died down a bit, so I could hear snippets of media without worrying about hearing anything, before I sat down and watched the finale, unruined.

In fact, another time I had attempted this was when, arrogantly, my roomate and I, who did not get HBO in our dorm, attempted to have his family tape all of season 4 of Sopranos and then save them so we could watch in a marathon fashion. Of course, this was a foolhardy effort, as both of us had (SPOILER if you have never seen Sopranos and plan to, though the statute of limitations is really starting to run on that...) Ralphie's death ruined for us on separate occasions, but, it was still a good season anyway.

Tuesday, March 25, 2008

So, for some reason I decided to wake up early this morning and watch baseball's opening day in Japan between the A's and the Red Sox. As I type this, the Red Sox have just taken a 3-2 lead...

...As a Daisuke Matzusaka fantasy owner and fan, I was worried early on, when he seemed to have no control, throwing five walks in the first few innings, and hitting a batter,but really rebounded to get out the last 7, striking out six in five innings, while luckily getting away with only giving up 2 runs.

...Talk about a contrast in style between the two pitchers...Blanton relies on not walking anyone and keeping the ball in the ballpark...his stuff certainly doesn't blow anyone away, while Daisuke was his own worst enemy; once he was able to find the strike zone, the As couldn't just wait out walks at the plate.

...the one thing I can say is I'm glad I didn't wake up early just to hear Joe Morgan on the telecast

...though Steve Phillips isn't much better - can we make a new rule in which there's a limit for how many times you can use the word "wheelhouse" in a game?

...can we start changing the default stats shown when each batter comes up? maybe from batting average/home runs/RBI to the "slash stats" batting average/on-base percentage/slugging percentage

...also you want to talk about how silly wins are in one sense - Daisuke really "won" the game for his team, kindly rooting them on to score three runs after his last inning pitched (of course Red Sox may not hold on, but even being in position to win...) (Update: Well, would have been, had Jack Hannahan not hit a 2 run bomb in the sixth to retake the lead for the As)

Monday, March 24, 2008

It's been too long, but I'd have to officially take down the blog if I didn't occasionally offer up some incredibly un-prescient predictions about sports. Baseball preview time, I'll predict records for each team, write a couple of words about them, and we'll see how well they each do. (I'll add up the total games to make sure that's even at least, but not sure how many interleague games are played, and too lazy to look them up, so, we'll guesstimate(I'm aware that's not a word))

AL East:

Boston Red Sox : 2007 :96-66 2008: 97-65
New York Yankees: 2007: 94-68 2008: 94-68
Toronto Blue Jays: 2007: 83-79 2008: 82-80
Tampa Bay Rays: 2007: 66-96 2008: 79-83
Baltimore Orioles: 2007: 69-93 2008: 63-99

AL Central:

Detroit Tigers: 2007: 88-74 2008: 94-68
Cleveland Indians: 2007: 96-66 2008: 93-69
Minnesota Twins: 2007: 79-83 2008: 75-87
Kansas City Royals 2007: 69-93 2008: 74-88
Chicago White Sox 2007: 72-90 2008: 72-90

AL West:

Los Angeles Angels of Anaheim: 2007: 94-68 2008: 94-68
Seattle Mariners: 2007: 88-74 2008: 84-78
Texas Rangers 2007: 75-87 2008: 75-87
Oakland Athletics: 2007: 76-86 2008: 69-93

NL East:

New York Mets: 2007: 88-74 2008: 92-70
Atlanta Braves 2007: 84-78 2008: 89-73
Philadelphia Phillies: 2007: 89-73 2008: 87-75
Washington Nationals: 2007: 73-89 2008: 73-89
Florida Marlins 2007: 71-91 2008: 67-95

NL Central:

Chicago Cubs: 2007: 85-77 2008: 87-75
Milwaukee Brewers: 2007: 83-79 2008: 84-78
Cincinnati Reds: 2007: 72-90 2008: 77-85
St. Louis Cardinals: 2007: 78-84 2008: 71-91
Houston Astros: 2007: 73-89 2008: 71-91
Pittsburgh Pirates: 2007: 68-94 2008: 65-97

NL West:

Arizona Diamondbacks: 2007: 90-72 2008: 91-71
Colorado Rockies: 2007: 90-73 2008: 89-73
Los Angeles Dodgers: 2007: 82-80 2008: 87-75
San Diego Padres 2007: 89-74 2008: 87-75
San Francisco Giants: 2007: 71-91 2008: 69 -93